Direct Observation of Stress Relaxation Process in 4H-SiC Homoepitaxial Layers via In Situ Synchrotron X-Ray Topography

Article Preview

Abstract:

During 4H silicon carbide (4H-SiC) homoepitaxy and post-growth processes, the development of stress relaxation has been observed, in which interfacial dislocations (IDs) are formed at the epilayer/substrate interface, relaxing the misfit strain induced by the nitrogen doping concentration difference between the epilayer and substrate. It is widely believed that an interfacial dislocation is created by the glide of a mobile segment of a basal plane dislocation (BPD) in the substrate or epilayer towards the interface, leaving a trailing edge component right at the interface. However, direct observation of such mechanisms has not been made in SiC before. In this work, we present an in situ study of the stress relaxation process, in which a specimen cut from a commercial 4H-SiC homoepitaxial wafer undergoes the stress relaxation process during a high-temperature heat treatment while sequential synchrotron white beam X-ray topographs were recorded simultaneously. Based on the dynamic observation of this process, it can be concluded that thermal stress plays a role in the relaxation process while the increased misfit strain at elevated temperature most likely drives the formation of an interfacial dislocation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

176-179

Citation:

Online since:

June 2018

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Skowronski and S. Ha, Journal of Applied Physics 99, 011101 (2006).

Google Scholar

[2] S. Ha, et al., Journal of Crystal Growth 244, 257 (2002).

Google Scholar

[3] H. Wang, et al., Materials Science Forum, 778-780, 328 (2014).

Google Scholar

[4] F.C. Frank and J.H. van der Merwe, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 198, 216 (1949).

Google Scholar

[5] J.H. van der Merwe, Journal of Applied Physics 34, 117 (1963).

Google Scholar

[6] J.W. Matthews and A.E. Blakeslee, Journal of Crystal Growth 27, 118 (1974).

Google Scholar

[7] J.W. Matthews, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology 12, 126 (1975).

Google Scholar

[8] H. Jacobson, et al., Applied Physics Letters 82, 3689 (2003).

Google Scholar

[9] H. Tsuchida, et al., Materials Science Forum 556-557, 271 (2007).

Google Scholar

[10] X. Zhang, et al., Journal of Applied Physics 101, 053517 (2007).

Google Scholar

[11] M. Dudley, et al., MRS Advances, 1(2), 91 (2016).

Google Scholar

[12] R.E. Stahlbush, et al., Materials Science Forum 821-823, 387 (2015).

Google Scholar

[13] A. Danilewsky, et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 268, 399 (2010).

Google Scholar

[14] J. Guo, et al., Journal of Electronic Materials 46(4), 2040 (2017).

Google Scholar

[15] X. Zhang, et al., Journal of Applied Physics 102, 093520 (2007).

Google Scholar

[16] Y. Yang, J. Guo, B. Raghothamachar, M. Dudley, S. Weit, A.N. Danilewsky, P.J. McNally, and B.K. Tanner, Materials Science Forum (submitted to These Proceedings in 2017).

Google Scholar

[17] P. Yang., G.S. Green, and B.K. Tanner, Institute of Physics Conference Series 100, 467-471 (1989).

Google Scholar

[18] G.S. Green, N. Loxley and B.K. Tanner, Journal of Applied Crystallography 24, 304 (1991).

Google Scholar

[19] X. Zhang, M. Nagano, and H. Tsuchida, Materials Science Forum 679-680, 306 (2011).

Google Scholar

[20] X. Zhang, T. Miyazawa, and H. Tsuchida, Materials Science Forum 717-720, 313 (2012).

Google Scholar

[21] H. Chung, M. Skowronski, Journal of Crystal Growth 259, 52 (2003).

Google Scholar

[22] M. Stockmeier, et al., Journal of Applied Physics 105, 033511 (2009).

Google Scholar

[23] S. Sasaki, J. Suda, and T. Kimoto, Materials Science Forum 717-720, 481 (2012).

Google Scholar