Abstract
Synchrotron X-ray section topographs and etch-pit micrographs of the wafers processed in a CMOS fab, are analyzed and correlated against the measured process-control monitoring data and the device yield obtained from the wafers. The etch-pit micrographs detail precipitates, dislocations, and stacking faults, whereas the X-ray topographs additionally show the strain gradient-caused by lattice bending and misfit. Specifically written image-processing software extracts features from the digitized topographs and micrographs after making computational adjustments. These extracted feature parameters are correlated against the electrically and optically obtained process-control monitoring data, collected from the wafer-processing results, and against the yield obtained from the wafer-probing stage. Several image features extracted from the synchrotron X-ray topographs exhibit a strong correlation to certain measured process parameters, e.g., PMOS transistor threshold voltage, polysilicon sheet resistance, and N-sheet contact chain resistance, rather than with others, like NMOS breakdown voltage, which correlated poorly. As a new result, positive correlation between good device yield and a strong near-surface strain gradient is found by synchrotron X-ray topography. Unexpectedly, computed from the etch-pit micrographs, the yield correlates very poorly to the defect-free zone depth of the wafer surface. The results suggests that strain has more impact on the operation of the electronic device than precipitates solely would have.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. A. Cunningham, IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manufact. 3 (1990) 60.
T. Tuomi, K. Naukkarinen and P. Rabe, Phys Stat. Solidi A 25 (1974) 93.
T. Tuomi, M. Tuominen, E. Prieur, J. Partanen, J. Lahtinen and J. Laakkonen, J. Electrochem. Soc. 142 (1995) 1699.
P. J. Mcnally, J. W. Curley, M. Bolt, A. Reader, T. Tuomi, R. RantamÄki, A. N. Danilewsky and I. Dewolf, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 10 (1999) 351.
D. K. Bowen, in “Applications of Synchrotron Radiation”, edited by H. Winick, D. Xian, M.-H. Ye and T. Huang (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1989) p. 77.
A. Authier, “Dynamical Theory of X-Ray Diffraction” (Oxford University Press, New York, 2001) p. 527.
B. E. Warren, “X-Ray Diffraction” (Dover Publications of Addison-Wesley, 1969) p. 331.
R. RantamÄki, T. Tuomi, Z. R. Zytkiewicz, D. Dobosz and P. J. Mcnally, J Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 32 (1999) A114.
T. Tuomi, S. Hahn, M. Tilli, C.-C. D. Wong and O. Borland, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 71 (1986) 47.
M. Karilahti, T. Tuomi, M. Taskinen, J. Tulkki, H. Lipsanen and P. Mcnally Il Nuovo Cimento 19 (1997) 181.
M. Futagami, J. Appl. Phys. 52 (1981) 5575.
M. Wright Jenkins, J. Electrochem. Soc. 124 (1977) 757.
B. D. Cullity, “Elements of X-Ray Diffraction” (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1956) p. 174.
J. Miltat, Lecture Notes in Physics 112, Imaging Processes and Coherence in Physics, Proceedings, Les Houches 1979 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, 1980) p. 505.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karilahti, M., Tuomi, T., Rantamäki, R. et al. Correlating integrated circuit process-induced strain and defects against device yield and process control monitoring data. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 14, 445–449 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023937709620
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023937709620