Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing the adhesion strength of 316L stainless steel joints after laser surface texturing by CO2 and fiber lasers

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on the effects of the laser surface texturing process and joint configuration of stainless steel adherends on the adhesive tensile bond strength. Two different sources, a CO2 and a fiber laser, were used and compared. In particular, proper choice of laser parameters was explored with the aim of producing different roughness and peak-to-valley distance and different textures on the bonding area, which could increase the real contact surface. Furthermore, to more thoroughly understand the effect of the laser parameters on joint fracture load, the experimental campaign was conducted according to a Design of Experiment (DoE) framework and the results were analyzed with this methodology. The creation of particular textures and roughness levels were related to the resulting joint geometrical configuration and bond strengths. In particular, significant increases in joint bond strength were achieved using both laser sources. Furthermore, by optimizing the laser parameters, smaller laser spot scan path overlaps can be achieved as well as a more refined scale of surface texture and surface roughness. This thereby enables the joining of thinner sections of different materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

RT:

Room temperature

DoE:

Design of experiment

JBS:

Joint bond strength

Ra :

Arithmetic mean height of the surface profile

RSM:

Response surface methodology

SLJ:

Single lap joint

TSS:

Tensile shear strength

References

  1. Baldan A (2004) Review adhesively-bonded joints and repairs in metallic alloys, polymers and composite materials: adhesives, adhesion theories and surface pretreatment. J Mater Sci 39:1–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Dam JPB, Abrahami ST, Yilmaz A et al (2019) Effect of surface roughness and chemistry on the adhesion and durability of a steel-epoxy adhesive interface. Int J Adhes Adhes 96:102450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brack N, Rider AN (2014) The influence of mechanical and chemical treatments on the environmental resistance of epoxy adhesive bonds to titanium. Int J Adhes Adhes 48:20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cardoso JV, Gamboa PV, Silva AP (2019) Effect of surface pre-treatment on the behaviour of adhesively-bonded CFRP T-joints. Eng Fail Anal 104:1188–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.05.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Prysiazhnyi V, Svoboda T, Dvořák M, Klíma M (2012) Aluminum surface treatment by the RF plasma pencil. Surf Coatings Technol 206:4140–4145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mandolfino C, Lertora E, Gambaro C, Pizzorni M (2019) Functionalization of neutral polypropylene by using low pressure plasma treatment: effects on surface characteristics and adhesion properties. Polymers (Basel) 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11020202

  7. Bizi-bandoki P, Benayoun S, Valette S et al (2011) Modifications of roughness and wettability properties of metals induced by femtosecond laser treatment. Appl Surf Sci 257:5213–5218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.12.089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alloys A, Treatment CA (2000) Standard guide for preparation of metal surfaces for adhesive bonding 1. Society 90:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2651-01R08.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grabowski A, Sozańska M, Adamiak M, Kępińska M, Florian T (2018) Laser surface texturing of Ti6Al4V alloy, stainless steel and aluminium silicon alloy. Appl Surf Sci 461:117–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurtovic A, Brandl E, Mertens T, Maier HJ (2013) Laser induced surface nano-structuring of Ti-6Al-4V for adhesive bonding. Int J Adhes Adhes 45:112–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lunder O, Lapique F, Johnsen B, Nisancioglu K (2004) Effect of pre-treatment on the durability of epoxy-bonded AA6060 aluminium joints. Int J Adhes Adhes 24:107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Loutas TH, Kliafa PM, Sotiriadis G, Kostopoulos V (2019) Investigation of the effect of green laser pre-treatment of aluminum alloys through a design-of-experiments approach. Surf Coatings Technol 375:370–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.07.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moroni F, Romoli L, Khan MMA (2018) Design of laser-textured surfaces to enhance the strength of adhesively bonded joints. Int J Adhes Adhes 85:208–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Musiari F, Moroni F, Favi C, Pirondi A (2019) Durability assessment of laser treated aluminium bonded joints. Int J Adhes Adhes 93:102323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.01.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rechner R, Jansen I, Beyer E (2010) Influence on the strength and aging resistance of aluminium joints by laser pre-treatment and surface modification. Int J Adhes Adhes 30:595–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Juan YC, Song MX, Ling TY et al (2016) Modification of wettability property of titanium by laser texturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87:1663–1670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8601-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu Y, Lin J, Carlson BE, Lu P, Balogh MP, Irish NP, Mei Y (2016) Effect of laser ablation surface treatment on performance of adhesive-bonded aluminum alloys. Surf Coatings Technol 304:340–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.04.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rotella G, Orazi L, Alfano M, Candamano S, Gnilitskyi I (2017) Innovative high-speed femtosecond laser nano-patterning for improved adhesive bonding of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 18:101–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2016.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rotella G, Alfano M, Schiefer T, Jansen I (2015) Enhancement of static strength and long term durability of steel/epoxy joints through a fiber laser surface pre-treatment. Int J Adhes Adhes 63:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahmed Obeidi M, McCarthy E, Brabazon D (2016) Methodology of laser processing for precise control of surface micro-topology. Surf Coatings Technol 307:702–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.09.075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Obeidi MA, McCarthy E, Kailas L, Brabazon D (2018) Laser surface texturing of stainless steel 316L cylindrical pins for interference fit applications. J Mater Process Technol 252:58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.09.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. ISO (1997) ISO 4287:1997 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—surface texture: profile method—terms, definitions and surface texture parameters

  23. ASTM D 1002–05 (2005) Standard test method for apparent shear strength of single-lap-joint adhesively bonded metal specimens by tension loading (metal-to-metal). Standards 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1520/D1002-10.on

  24. Romoli L, Moroni F, Khan MMA (2017) A study on the influence of surface laser texturing on the adhesive strength of bonded joints in aluminium alloys. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol 66:237–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wegman RF, Van Twisk J, Wegman RF, Van Twisk J (2013) Introduction. In: Surface preparation techniques for adhesive bonding. Elsevier, pp 1–8

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Chiara De Giorgi and IPG Photonics Italy S.r.l for the support provided in fiber laser surface treatment. The authors wish also to thank 3M Italy for the constant support in carrying out research activities on adhesive bonding technology.

Funding

This work was part funded from research supported by a research grant from Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) under grant number 16/RC/3872 and is co-funded under the European Regional Development Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Mandolfino.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mandolfino, C., Obeidi, M., Lertora, E. et al. Comparing the adhesion strength of 316L stainless steel joints after laser surface texturing by CO2 and fiber lasers. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109, 1059–1069 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05639-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05639-6

Keywords

Navigation