Skip to main content

Picture Bias in Upper-division Physics Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Multimedia learning theories tell us that learning is more effective with text and pictures than with text alone. However, pictures can also favor an uncritical attitude towards scientific texts. This can mislead students into believing flawed information or overlooking conflicting information. Furthermore, the types of representations have impact on learning, information processing, and communication. In this project, we investigate possible negative aspects of adding pictures to text and study the impact of equation density in the context of upper-division physics education. In this specific contribution, we present a first preliminary eye-tracking study on the context of integration in electrostatics in “traditional” multimedia settings, involving a contrast between optimal pictures, (possibly) misleading pictures, and no pictures at all. The results confirm the hypothesis that pictures can also have detrimental effects on learning when surface features are conflicting with scientific concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ainsworth, S., Bibby, P., & Wood, D. (2002). Examining the effects of different multiple representational systems in learning primary mathematics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 25–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berends, I. E., & van Lieshout, E. C. (2009). The effect of illustrations in arithmetic problem-solving: Effects of increased cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 19(4), 345–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, T. W., & Higginson, A. D. (2012). Heavy use of equations impedes communication among biologists. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(29), 11735–11739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isberner, M.-B., Richter, T., Maier, J., Knuth-Herzig, K., Horz, H., & Schnotz, W. (2013). Comprehending conflicting science-related texts: Graphs as plausibility cues. Instructional Science, 41, 849–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, P., Kuhn, J., & Müller, A. (2018). Förderung von Repräsentationskompetenz und Experimentbezug in den vorlesungsbegleitenden Übungen zur Experimentalphysik. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 24, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, P. B., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2008). Patterns of multiple representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 4(1), 010111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, J., Lukowicz, P., Hirth, M., Poxrucker, A., Weppner, J., & Younas, J. (2016). gPhysics – Using smart glasses for head-centered, context-aware learning in physics experiments. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(4), 304–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzner, A., Schnotz, W., & Müller, A. (2013). The role of decorative pictures in learning. Instructional Science, 41, 811–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. P., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition, 107(1), 343–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ögren, M., Nyström, M., & Jarodzka, H. (2017). There’s more to the multimedia effect than meets the eye: Is seeing pictures believing? Instructional Science, 45(2), 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, B., Moreno, R., Seufert, T., & Brünken, R. (2011). Does cognitive load moderate the seductive details effect? A multimedia study. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rau, M. A. (2016). Conditions for the effectiveness of multiple visual representations in enhancing STEM learning. Educational Psychology Review, 29(4), 717–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strzys, M. P., Kapp, S., Thees, M., Klein, P., Lukowicz, P., Knierim, P., et al. (2018). Physics holo.lab learning experience: Using smartglasses for augmented reality labwork to foster the concepts of heat conduction. European Journal of Physics, 39(3), 035703 (. 12pp.. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/aaa8fb

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55, 37–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal Klein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Klein, P., Küchemann, S., van Kampen, P., Doughty, L., Kuhn, J. (2019). Picture Bias in Upper-division Physics Education. In: Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O. (eds) Frontiers and Advances in Positive Learning in the Age of InformaTiOn (PLATO). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26578-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26578-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26577-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26578-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics